The innovation of the deconstructive analysis is the achievement of a new way of thinking without establishing a new centered system. It does not try to replace any former method because it is not a method itself but a way of reflecting upon them.

Every system of thought has its flaws, its inconsistencies, the field of deconstructive analysis. When we deconstruct a piece of work of any kind, we are usually exposing its weak points, highlighting the unconscious structure that lies behind. What this produces is uncertainty and a profound destabilization of our internal hierarchy of ideas: anytime the society has been exposed to its own failures, it has started a new movement, reacting against what wasn’t formerly discussed. Deconstruction has obtained this reaction, in the late 60s, as Romanticism did at the middle of the XIX century, or impressionism at the beginning of the XX century.



Comments are closed.